On 14 September 2022, the EU Commission published its proposal for a Regulation introducing a ban on the placing and making available on the EU market or export from the EU market of products made using forced labour (see press release here). Following on from Commission President von der Leyen’s announcement of the proposed ban in her State of the Union Address last year, under the Proposed Regulation, products found to have been made using forced labour cannot be sold in, exported from or imported into the EU.

The proposal combines the EU’s human rights agenda priorities of combating forced labour and promoting corporate sustainability due diligence standards. It further adds to the series of EU measures that will impact supply chains, including new proposals for rules on foreign subsidies, corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence, carbon taxes, deforestation , and the single market emergency instrument.

Scope

The Proposed Regulation adopts a ‘non-discriminatory’ approach, covering all products (including components) for which forced labour has been used in whole or in part, at any stage of the product’s extraction, harvest, production or manufacture. The prohibition will apply regardless of whether the goods are produced in the EU for domestic consumption or export, as well as to imported goods. It does not purport to target specific countries, companies or industries.

Investigations and Enforcement

To enforce the new rules, the proposal gives National Competent Authorities (“NCAs“) at Member State level powers to investigate and punish, using applicable Member State law, companies that violate the prohibition. The burden of proof to establish that forced labour has been used at any stage of the supply chain prior to the placement of the products on the market will lie with these NCAs.

Investigations carried out by NCAs will be split into two stages. At the preliminary phase, NCAs must follow a risk-based approach and determine whether there is a ‘substantiated concern‘ of a violation of the prohibition. This assessment should be based on all relevant information available to them, including information requested from other relevant authorities and a database of forced labour risk areas or products maintained by the Commission (which will be built from reports from e.g. the International Labour Organization, civil society, and business organisations).

NCAs should request from the economic operators information on actions they have taken to identify, prevent, mitigate or bring to an end risks of forced labour in their operations and value chains, with respect to the products concerned.  NCAs must not initiate an investigation where they consider, on the basis of their initial assessment (including the information submitted by the economic operators) that there is no substantiated concern of a violation. In their assessment, NCAs should focus on economic operators involved in the steps of the value chain as close as possible to where the risk of forced labour is likely to occur and take into account the size and economic resources of the economic operators, the quantity of products concerned, as well as the scale of suspected forced labour.

If, within 30 working days following receipt of the information from the economic operators, the NCAs find that there is a ‘substantiated concern‘ of forced labour, they may progress to the full investigatory phase. During this phase, the economic operators concerned must submit to the NCAs any information that is ‘relevant and necessary‘ for the investigations, including information identifying the relevant products, the manufacturer or producer and the suppliers. As part of these investigations, NCAs will be empowered to request information from companies and carry out checks and inspections, including in countries outside the EU.

NCAs must then relay their findings to the customs authorities of the Member State, which are empowered to block the circulation of the relevant goods. If the NCAs determine that forced labour was used to make the products in question, the relevant goods must be withdrawn from the EU market by the relevant companies, and subsequently disposed of.

In the event of non-compliance, relevant companies will face ‘effective, proportionate and dissuasive‘ penalties under national law. Member State cooperation lies at the heart of the proposal, with NCA investigations to be assisted by a new EU Forced Labour Product Network to facilitate data sharing across the Union. Furthermore, conclusions reached on products by an NCA in one Member State will be recognised and enforced by the NCAs of the other Member States.

Due Diligence Obligations and Guidance

The Commission will issue guidance for companies on forced labour due diligence and information on risk indicators of forced labour within 18 months from the entry into force of the Regulation, in order to assist companies with their due diligence obligations and practices.

These guidelines are likely to build on the Commission’s guidance on due diligence to help EU companies address the risk of forced labour in their operations and supply chains, published in July 2021 (see our previous blog post here). It should also be read in the context of the Commission’s proposal for a Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive, published in February 2022, which seeks to establish due diligence obligations for companies to identify, prevent, mitigate and account for actual and potential adverse human rights and environmental impacts in their global supply chains.

Next Steps and Key Takeaways

The Commission’s proposal will now be discussed with the European Parliament and Council, before the final text of the legislation is published.

In the meantime, in the context of increasing consumer pressure, regulatory and governmental scrutiny and developing legislation in this area (in the EU and, more broadly, across the globe), companies should continue to monitor developments and conduct regular, thorough reviews of their supply chains for human rights (including forced labour) and environmental impacts. This also means implementing robust and effective compliance processes in line with international due diligence standards and relevant guidance, before taking adequate steps to address forced labour and other risks in their global value chains and wider business operations.

Author

Graham Stuart is a partner in Baker McKenzie's London office specialising in product regulation and environmental, health and safety law. Graham advises on the regulation of pharmaceuticals, medical devices, chemicals, food, and a wide range of consumer and industrial products, acting for clients in connection with global integrations and reorganisations; product manufacturing, marketing, supply and distribution; EU and UK product authorisation regimes; non-conformities, regulatory investigations and prosecutions. His practice also covers operational environmental, health and safety matters for industrial and manufacturing facilities; the assessment and management of environmental risk in complex multi-jurisdictional projects, mergers and acquisitions; and climate change law and emissions trading.

Author

Adeel Haque is an Associate in Baker McKenzie's London office. Adeel qualified in September 2019 and has spent time working in the Firm's Hong Kong office. He advises clients on international trade (trade sanctions and export controls), competition, product regulatory, environmental, anti-bribery and corruption and customs law issues.

Author

Arnoud Willems is a partner in the International Commercial & Trade Practice Group in the Brussels office. He joined Baker McKenzie in 2022. He has an extensive network, built over 25 years as a trusted advisor of entrepreneurs, executives, and diplomats. Arnoud has a deep understanding of how trade rules shape global flows of capital, investment, goods, technology, and services.

Author

Dr. Bregt Natens is a counsel in the IC&T Practice Group in the Brussels office. He joined Baker McKenzie in 2022. Bregt regularly teaches on trade law and his research has been published in leading journals.